Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs styled-jsx Analysis

astroturf

v1.2.0(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS solution for styling React components. It allows developers to write CSS directly in JavaScript using familiar CSS syntax, which is then transformed into efficient, scoped CSS at build time. Astroturf provides a seamless integration with React components, enabling the use of dynamic styles, theming, and CSS variables.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
emotion+
linaria+
goober+
stitches+
styletron+
jss+
aphrodite+
glamorous+
radium+

Tags: javascriptreactcss-in-jsstylingbuild-time

styled-jsx

v5.1.6(27 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Styled-jsx is a library that allows you to write scoped and component-specific CSS in your React components using a CSS-in-JS approach. It provides a way to style your components without worrying about global CSS conflicts, as styles are encapsulated within the component. Styled-jsx supports both inline styles and global styles, giving you flexibility in how you manage your styles.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
linaria+
jss+
aphrodite+
glamorous+
goober+
styletron-react+
stitches+
treat+

Tags: reactcss-in-jsstylingscoped-stylescomponent-specific

Fight!

Popularity

Both Astroturf and styled-jsx are popular choices for styling in React applications. However, styled-jsx has been around for longer and has a larger user base and community support. Astroturf, while gaining popularity, is relatively newer and has a smaller user base.

Approach to Styling

Astroturf follows a CSS-in-JS approach, allowing you to write CSS code directly in your JavaScript files using familiar syntax. styled-jsx, on the other hand, uses a unique approach where you can include CSS styles within your React components using a specific `style` tag. Both packages offer similar functionality but differ in their implementation style.

Performance

Both Astroturf and styled-jsx aim to optimize performance. However, Astroturf is known for its better runtime performance as it generates static CSS class names during the build process. This can result in smaller bundle sizes and improved rendering performance compared to styled-jsx, which inserts styles dynamically at runtime.

Developer Experience

Both packages offer a good developer experience, but they differ in their usage and setup. Astroturf integrates smoothly with popular build tools like webpack and Rollup, and provides extensive TypeScript support. styled-jsx, on the other hand, requires the Babel plugin for transpiling and has its own unique syntax. It also offers better support for global styles and server-side rendering.

Community and Ecosystem

styled-jsx has a larger and more mature ecosystem, with support from Next.js and being widely used in production applications. Astroturf is newer and has a smaller community, but it is actively maintained and is gaining popularity. It may offer a more lightweight and focused solution for those who prefer a minimalistic styling approach.