Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs styled-components Analysis

astroturf

v1.2.0(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS solution for styling React components. It allows developers to write CSS directly in JavaScript using familiar CSS syntax, which is then transformed into efficient, scoped CSS at build time. Astroturf provides a seamless integration with React components, enabling the use of dynamic styles, theming, and CSS variables.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
emotion+
linaria+
goober+
stitches+
styletron+
jss+
aphrodite+
glamorous+
radium+

Tags: javascriptreactcss-in-jsstylingbuild-time

styled-components

v6.1.11(about 1 month ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 9Monthly npm downloads

Styled-components is a popular CSS-in-JS library for styling React components. It allows you to write actual CSS code to style your components directly within your JavaScript files, providing a more maintainable and scalable styling solution. With styled-components, you can easily create dynamic styles based on props, use nested components, and leverage the full power of CSS features like media queries and keyframes.

Alternatives:
emotion+
linaria+
styled-jsx+
goober+
jss+
aphrodite+
styletron+
glamorous+
stitches+
treat+

Tags: reactcss-in-jsstylingcomponentsdynamic-styles

Fight!

Styling Approach

Astroturf and Styled-components both offer CSS-in-JS solutions for styling in React applications. Astroturf uses a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS approach, which means it compiles styles at build time and generates static CSS files. Styled-components, on the other hand, injects styles dynamically at runtime using JavaScript.

Performance

In terms of performance, Astroturf has an advantage as it generates static CSS files during build time, reducing the runtime overhead. Styled-components, on the other hand, injects styles dynamically, which can impact performance, especially in larger applications.

Developer Experience

Astroturf provides a familiar CSS syntax and integrates seamlessly with React components. It offers a simple and intuitive API for styling components. Styled-components, on the other hand, introduces a new way of writing styles within JavaScript using template literals, which might have a steeper learning curve for some developers.

Community and Ecosystem

Styled-components has a larger community and ecosystem compared to Astroturf. This means that Styled-components has more resources, third-party integrations, and community support available. Astroturf, being a newer library, might have a smaller community but is actively maintained and growing.

Flexibility

Styled-components offer more flexibility in terms of dynamic styling and theming capabilities. It allows for dynamic changes to styles based on props and supports theming out of the box. Astroturf, being more focused on static styles, may have limitations in dynamic styling scenarios.