Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs Radium Analysis

astroturf

v1.2.0(about 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS solution for styling React components. It allows developers to write CSS directly in their JavaScript files using familiar CSS syntax, which is then transformed into efficient and scoped CSS at build time. Astroturf provides a seamless integration with React components, enabling the use of dynamic styles, theming, and CSS variables.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
emotion+
linaria+
goober+
stitches+
styletron+
jss+
aphrodite+
glamor+
fela+

Tags: reactcss-in-jsstylingzero-runtimebuild-time

radium

v0.26.2(about 2 years ago)

This package is deprecated. Consider finding alternatives.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/radiumNumber of direct dependencies: 4Monthly npm downloads

Radium is a popular JavaScript library that provides a set of tools for managing inline styles in React applications. It allows developers to write CSS styles directly within their JavaScript components using JavaScript objects, enabling dynamic styling based on component state or props. Radium offers features like automatic vendor prefixing, media queries, and keyframes support, making it easy to create responsive and interactive UI components.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
emotion+
jss+
aphrodite+
glamorous+
styletron+
linaria+
goober+
stitches+
fela+

Tags: javascriptreactinline-stylesCSS-in-JSdeprecated

Fight!

Popularity

Both Astroturf and Radium are decently popular packages in the JavaScript community. Radium has been around for longer and has gained popularity for its inline styling capabilities, while Astroturf is a relatively newer package that provides similar functionality.

Styling Approach

Astroturf uses a CSS-in-JS approach where you write your stylesheets using JavaScript or TypeScript, similar to libraries like Emotion and Styled Components. Radium, on the other hand, focuses on adding inline styles to React components.

Performance

In terms of performance, both packages perform well. Radium utilizes inline styles with automatic vendor prefixing and on-demand rendering optimization. Astroturf, being a CSS-in-JS library, generates efficient CSS classes at build time. Both approaches are optimized to reduce runtime performance overhead.

Developer Experience

Astroturf provides a more modern and ergonomic API with support for both JavaScript and TypeScript. It offers features like auto-complete, linting, and mixins for enhanced developer experience. Radium, on the other hand, has a simpler API that focuses on adding inline styles in a React component and doesn't provide as many advanced features.

Compatibility

Both Astroturf and Radium work well with React but have slightly different compatibility with other frontend frameworks. Astroturf is primarily designed to work with React, but can also be used with other frameworks that support CSS-in-JS. Radium, on the other hand, is specifically built for React and may not be compatible with other frameworks out of the box.

Maintenance

Both Astroturf and Radium are actively maintained by their respective communities. However, Astroturf has a more active development and release cycle, with regular updates and new features being added. Radium, while still maintained, has seen a decrease in activity recently.