Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs MaterializeCSS Analysis

astroturf

v1.2.0(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS solution for styling React components. It allows developers to write CSS directly in their JavaScript files using familiar CSS syntax, which is then transformed into efficient and scoped CSS at build time. Astroturf provides a seamless integration with React components, enabling dynamic styling based on props and state without sacrificing performance.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
emotion+
linaria+
stitches+
vanilla-extract+
styled-jsx+
goober+
twin.macro+
fela+
jss+

Tags: javascriptcss-in-jsreactstylingbuild-time

materialize-css

v1.0.0(about 6 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/materialize-cssNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Materialize CSS is a modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design principles. It provides a clean and intuitive user interface with ready-to-use components like buttons, forms, cards, and navigation elements. Materialize CSS offers a grid system for easy layout structuring and supports customization through Sass variables and mixins.

Alternatives:
bootstrap+
bulma+
foundation-sites+
semantic-ui+
tailwindcss+
uikit+
ant-design+
spectre.css+
primer-css+
purecss+

Tags: cssframeworkresponsivematerial-designcomponents

Fight!

Use Case

Astroturf is primarily used for styling components in React applications using CSS-in-JS approach, providing a seamless integration with React components. Materialize-css, on the other hand, is a CSS framework that offers pre-designed components and styles for building responsive web applications.

Popularity

Astroturf is popular within the React community for its CSS-in-JS capabilities, especially for those who prefer a more JavaScript-centric styling approach. Materialize-css, on the other hand, is widely used for quickly prototyping and building visually appealing websites due to its ready-to-use components and styles.

Customization

Astroturf allows for more granular control over styling by enabling the use of JavaScript objects for defining styles, which can be beneficial for complex styling requirements. Materialize-css, while offering a wide range of components and styles out of the box, may have limitations in terms of customization compared to a CSS-in-JS solution like Astroturf.

Performance

Astroturf, being a CSS-in-JS solution, can optimize styles at build time and eliminate unused styles, potentially leading to better performance. Materialize-css, being a CSS framework with pre-designed styles, may include more CSS rules than necessary, impacting performance to some extent.

Learning Curve

Astroturf requires developers to understand the CSS-in-JS paradigm and its specific syntax, which might have a learning curve for those unfamiliar with this approach. Materialize-css, being a CSS framework, is relatively easier to use as it provides ready-to-use classes and components that developers can leverage without diving deep into CSS-in-JS concepts.