Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs Material Design Lite Analysis
v1.2.0(7 months ago)
Alternatives: styled-components, emotion, linaria
v1.3.0(almost 7 years ago)
Material Design Lite (MDL) is a lightweight front-end framework that implements Material Design, Google's design language. It offers a range of pre-built UI components and provides easy-to-follow guidelines for designing clean and modern web interfaces. With MDL, you can quickly and easily create responsive websites and web apps that are both visually appealing and easy to use.
Material Design Lite (MDL) has been widely adopted and used in numerous projects, especially those that follow the Material Design guidelines. Astroturf, on the other hand, is more niche and targeted towards developers who prefer CSS-in-JS solutions. MDL has a larger user base and more community support.
Material Design Lite is a comprehensive library that provides a range of components, styles, and guidelines for building modern web interfaces that adhere to Material Design principles. Astroturf, on the other hand, is focused on providing a powerful and efficient CSS-in-JS solution for styling React components. While MDL offers a broader range of UI components, Astroturf excels in providing a seamless developer experience for managing CSS-in-JS styling.
Community and Support
Material Design Lite has a larger community and has been around for a longer time. It has extensive documentation, community forums, and multiple examples and resources available. Astroturf, although more niche, also has an active community with regular updates and support available through its GitHub repository.
Astroturf, being a CSS-in-JS solution, generates optimized, scoped CSS at runtime, resulting in minimal CSS bundle sizes and better performance. In contrast, Material Design Lite relies on pre-compiled CSS files, which may result in larger CSS bundles and potentially impact performance in larger applications.