Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs JSS Analysis

astroturf

v1.2.0(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS solution for styling React components. It allows developers to write CSS directly in their JavaScript files using familiar CSS syntax, which is then transformed into efficient and scoped CSS at build time. Astroturf provides a seamless integration with React components, enabling dynamic styling based on props and state without sacrificing performance.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
emotion+
linaria+
stitches+
twin.macro+
goober+
fela+
jss+
styletron+
glamor+

Tags: javascriptreactcss-in-jsstylingzero-runtime

jss

v10.10.0(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 4Monthly npm downloads

JSS is a powerful and versatile JavaScript library for creating and managing CSS styles using JavaScript objects. It allows developers to define styles dynamically based on props or state, enabling a more flexible and efficient styling approach. JSS supports various CSS features like nesting, variables, and media queries, making it easy to create responsive and maintainable stylesheets.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
emotion+
styled-jsx+
aphrodite+
linaria+
stitches+
fela+
glamor+
goober+
cxs+

Tags: javascriptcssstylingdynamic-stylesresponsive

Fight!

Popularity

Both Astroturf and JSS are popular options in the CSS-in-JS space. Astroturf has gained popularity in recent years and has a growing community, while JSS has been around for longer and has a more established user base.

Approach

Astroturf focuses on providing a zero-runtime solution for CSS-in-JS, meaning that it compiles the CSS styles at build time and doesn't require any runtime library. JSS, on the other hand, provides both compile-time and runtime solutions, giving developers the flexibility to choose between server-side rendering or client-side dynamic styles.

API Design

Astroturf follows a similar API to CSS modules, allowing you to write CSS styles using standard syntax and import them into your JavaScript files. It provides a seamless integration with popular libraries like React. JSS, on the other hand, offers a more programmatic approach to styling, allowing you to define and manipulate styles using JavaScript objects.

Performance

In terms of performance, Astroturf has the advantage of generating static CSS files at build time, resulting in smaller bundle sizes and faster runtime performance. JSS, on the other hand, has a runtime layer that allows for dynamic styling and on-the-fly style updates, which might come with a slight performance cost.

Features

Astroturf provides features like CSS modules, automatic vendor prefixing, and tree shaking for eliminating unused styles. JSS offers a broader set of features, including theming, nesting, dynamic style updates, server-side rendering support, and a plugin system that allows for extending its functionality.

Integration

Both Astroturf and JSS seamlessly integrate with React and other popular JavaScript frameworks. They can be used alongside existing CSS frameworks and support CSS-in-JS paradigms, allowing for component-based styling and encapsulation.