Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs Foundation Analysis


v1.2.0(7 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS library for React. It allows you to write CSS styles in JavaScript using a familiar CSS syntax, and then generates optimized CSS at build time. This eliminates the need for runtime CSS processing and improves performance.

Alternatives: styled-components, emotion, linaria

Tags: javascriptcss-in-jsreactstylingperformance


v6.8.1(about 2 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Foundation Sites is a front-end framework for developing responsive websites. Foundation offers various components such as responsive grids, buttons, navigation menus, forms, and typography styles that are easy to customize. It also includes powerful plugins like an image slider, modal dialogs, and an equalizer component that makes it easy to ensure all elements in a row are the same height. Foundation's Sass-powered framework makes it easy to change the look and feel of your website by customizing the variables. Foundation Sites is an excellent choice for building a custom web design system with modular components, ensuring consistency and saving time.

Alternatives: Bootstrap, Materialize, Semantic UI

Tags: front-endframeworkresponsiveSassmodularcustomizable



Foundation Sites is a popular and widely-used front-end framework with a large community and a long history. Astroturf, on the other hand, is a lesser-known package that provides a CSS-in-JS solution. While Foundation Sites has a larger user base, Astroturf is gaining popularity within the CSS-in-JS community.

Use Case

Foundation Sites is a comprehensive front-end framework that provides a wide range of components and utilities for building responsive websites and applications. It is suitable for larger projects and offers a complete set of tools for UI development. Astroturf, on the other hand, specializes in CSS-in-JS and provides a solution for styling components using JavaScript.


Foundation Sites has a significant number of dependencies as it encompasses a comprehensive set of features. It may require additional setup and configuration. Astroturf, on the other hand, has minimal dependencies and is lightweight, making it easier to integrate into projects without introducing excessive complexity.


Astroturf is specifically designed to solve the problem of styling components using JavaScript. It offers a seamless integration with React and allows you to write CSS styles directly within your JavaScript/TypeScript code. Foundation Sites, on the other hand, follows a traditional approach to styling with separate CSS files. If you prefer a more traditional approach or have an existing CSS workflow, Foundation Sites may be a better choice.


Foundation Sites provides a large set of customizable components, styles, and themes. You can easily tweak and customize the framework to fit your project's needs. Astroturf, on the other hand, allows you to define and customize styles directly within your components, providing more granular control over styling.

Community and Support

Foundation Sites has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. It also has a longer history and is backed by a dedicated team. Astroturf, while not as well-established, has an active community and offers support through its documentation and GitHub repository.