Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs Foundation Analysis

astroturf

v1.2.0(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS solution for styling React components. It allows developers to write CSS directly in JavaScript using familiar CSS syntax, which is then transformed into efficient, scoped CSS at build time. Astroturf provides a seamless integration with React components, enabling the use of dynamic styles, theming, and CSS variables.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
emotion+
linaria+
goober+
stitches+
styletron+
jss+
aphrodite+
glamorous+
radium+

Tags: javascriptreactcss-in-jsstylingbuild-time

foundation-sites

v6.8.1(10 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Foundation Sites is a responsive front-end framework that provides a robust set of tools and components for building modern and mobile-friendly websites. It offers a grid system, responsive navigation, buttons, forms, and various UI elements to streamline the development process. Foundation Sites is known for its flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to create unique designs while maintaining a consistent user experience across devices.

Alternatives:
bootstrap+
tailwindcss+
bulma+
semantic-ui+
uikit+
materialize+
tachyons+
spectre.css+
primer-css+
milligram+

Tags: front-endresponsiveframeworkmobile-firstUI components

Fight!

Popularity

Foundation Sites is a popular and widely-used front-end framework with a large community and a long history. Astroturf, on the other hand, is a lesser-known package that provides a CSS-in-JS solution. While Foundation Sites has a larger user base, Astroturf is gaining popularity within the CSS-in-JS community.

Use Case

Foundation Sites is a comprehensive front-end framework that provides a wide range of components and utilities for building responsive websites and applications. It is suitable for larger projects and offers a complete set of tools for UI development. Astroturf, on the other hand, specializes in CSS-in-JS and provides a solution for styling components using JavaScript.

Dependencies

Foundation Sites has a significant number of dependencies as it encompasses a comprehensive set of features. It may require additional setup and configuration. Astroturf, on the other hand, has minimal dependencies and is lightweight, making it easier to integrate into projects without introducing excessive complexity.

CSS-in-JS

Astroturf is specifically designed to solve the problem of styling components using JavaScript. It offers a seamless integration with React and allows you to write CSS styles directly within your JavaScript/TypeScript code. Foundation Sites, on the other hand, follows a traditional approach to styling with separate CSS files. If you prefer a more traditional approach or have an existing CSS workflow, Foundation Sites may be a better choice.

Customization

Foundation Sites provides a large set of customizable components, styles, and themes. You can easily tweak and customize the framework to fit your project's needs. Astroturf, on the other hand, allows you to define and customize styles directly within your components, providing more granular control over styling.

Community and Support

Foundation Sites has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. It also has a longer history and is backed by a dedicated team. Astroturf, while not as well-established, has an active community and offers support through its documentation and GitHub repository.