Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs Fela Analysis

astroturf

v1.2.0(about 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS solution for styling React components. It allows developers to write CSS directly in JavaScript using familiar CSS syntax, which is then transformed into efficient, scoped CSS at build time. Astroturf provides a seamless integration with React components, enabling the use of dynamic styles, theming, and CSS variables.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
emotion+
linaria+
goober+
stitches+
styletron+
jss+
aphrodite+
glamorous+
radium+

Tags: javascriptreactcss-in-jsstylingbuild-time

fela

v12.2.1(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 5Monthly npm downloads

Fela is a high-performance, framework-agnostic styling library for React and other JavaScript frameworks. It follows a functional and atomic CSS approach, allowing you to create dynamic and responsive styles using JavaScript objects. Fela's unique feature is its ability to generate atomic CSS classes on the fly, resulting in smaller CSS bundles and improved performance.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
jss+
glamor+
aphrodite+
styletron+
radium+
linaria+
goober+
stitches+

Tags: javascriptstylingreactatomic-cssperformance

Fight!

Styling Approach

Astroturf is a CSS-in-JS solution that allows you to write CSS directly in your JavaScript files using a familiar CSS syntax. Fela, on the other hand, is a more abstract and powerful styling library that follows a functional and atomic CSS approach.

Performance

Fela is known for its excellent performance due to its atomic CSS approach, which generates minimal and highly optimized CSS output. Astroturf also provides good performance but may not be as optimized as Fela in certain scenarios.

Developer Experience

Astroturf offers a seamless developer experience by allowing you to write CSS directly in your components without the need for additional build steps. Fela, on the other hand, requires a more structured approach and may have a steeper learning curve for beginners.

Community and Ecosystem

Fela has a strong community and ecosystem with additional plugins and tools that enhance its functionality. Astroturf, while not as widely adopted, also has a supportive community and is actively maintained.

Scalability

Fela's atomic CSS approach makes it highly scalable and suitable for large applications where styling needs to be efficiently managed. Astroturf is also scalable but may require additional considerations for larger projects.