Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs Bulma Analysis


v1.2.0(7 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS library for React. It allows you to write CSS styles in JavaScript using a familiar CSS syntax, and then generates optimized CSS at build time. This eliminates the need for runtime CSS processing and improves performance.

Alternatives: styled-components, emotion, linaria

Tags: javascriptcss-in-jsreactstylingperformance


v0.9.4(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Bulma is a modern, open-source, and CSS-based design framework. It provides a set of widgets, utilities, and standardized styles that allow developers to quickly create responsive and user-friendly websites. Bulma emphasizes on mobile-first designs and provides a clean and consistent look-and-feel to your website. As it is built using CSS, developers have the freedom to use it with any front-end library or framework of their choice.

Alternatives: bootstrap, foundation, semantic-ui

Tags: cssdesign-systemresponsiveflexboxmobile-first



Both Astroturf and Bulma are popular npm packages, but in different domains. Astroturf is a popular choice among React developers for styling components, while Bulma is a widely used CSS framework for building responsive and modern websites.


Astroturf is a CSS-in-JS library specifically designed for React. It provides a way to write CSS in JavaScript and allows for scoped styles, theme variables, and dynamic styles. Bulma, on the other hand, is a comprehensive CSS framework that provides a set of pre-designed UI components, grid system, and utilities for building responsive websites.


Astroturf seamlessly integrates with React applications, offering a more cohesive development experience for styling React components. Bulma, being a CSS framework, can be used with any web project regardless of the JavaScript framework being used.


Astroturf allows for easy customization of styles using JavaScript variables, making it flexible and adaptable to different project requirements. Bulma, on the other hand, allows customization through CSS variables and provides a wide range of built-in customization options.

Developer Experience

Astroturf offers a modern and intuitive developer experience, providing features like autocompletion, linting, and static analysis. Bulma, being a CSS framework, is easy to use but does not offer as many developer-centric features as Astroturf.

Community Support

Both packages have active and supportive communities. Astroturf has gained popularity within the React ecosystem and has a growing community of contributors. Bulma has a large and established community with many resources, tutorials, and integrations available.

Learning Curve

Astroturf has a slight learning curve as it introduces CSS-in-JS concepts and requires developers to write CSS within JavaScript files. Bulma, being a CSS framework, has a relatively low learning curve and can be used with basic CSS knowledge.