Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs Bootstrap Analysis

astroturf

v1.2.0(almost 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS solution for styling React components. It allows developers to write CSS directly in JavaScript using familiar CSS syntax, which is then transformed into efficient, scoped CSS at build time. Astroturf provides a seamless integration with React components, enabling dynamic styling based on props and state without sacrificing performance.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
emotion+
linaria+
stitches+
twin.macro+
goober+
fela+
styled-jsx+
jss+
glamor+

Tags: css-in-jsreactstylingzero-runtimebuild-time

bootstrap

v5.3.3(10 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/bootstrapNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Bootstrap is a popular front-end framework for building responsive and mobile-first websites and web applications. It provides a collection of CSS and JavaScript components, such as grids, buttons, forms, and navigation bars, that help developers create visually appealing and consistent layouts. Bootstrap's grid system allows for easy customization and adaptation to different screen sizes, making it ideal for creating responsive designs.

Alternatives:
bulma+
tailwindcss+
foundation-sites+
materialize-css+
semantic-ui+
uikit+
ant-design+
purecss+
skeleton+
spectre.css+

Tags: front-endframeworkresponsiveCSSJavaScript

Fight!

Popularity

Bootstrap is one of the most popular CSS frameworks and has a large community of users and contributors. Astroturf, on the other hand, is a relatively newer library and may not have the same level of popularity as Bootstrap.

Functionality

Bootstrap is a comprehensive CSS framework that provides a wide range of pre-designed components, responsive grid system, and utility classes. It is suitable for building responsive and visually appealing websites. Astroturf, on the other hand, is a CSS-in-JS library that allows you to write CSS styles in JavaScript. It provides a way to create and manage scoped styles in your React components.

Integration

Bootstrap can be easily integrated into any web project, regardless of the technology stack. It provides pre-built CSS and JavaScript files that can be included in your HTML. Astroturf, on the other hand, is specifically designed for React projects and requires the use of JavaScript to define and apply styles.

Customization

Bootstrap provides a wide range of customization options, allowing you to modify the look and feel of the components to match your project's design. Astroturf, on the other hand, allows you to write custom styles using JavaScript, giving you more flexibility and control over the styling of your React components.

Learning Curve

Bootstrap has a well-documented API and a large community, which makes it easier to find resources and get help when needed. Astroturf, being a newer library, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available. However, if you are already familiar with React and JavaScript, learning Astroturf should not be too difficult.

Performance

Bootstrap is a large CSS framework and includes a lot of styles and components, which can impact the performance of your website. Astroturf, on the other hand, generates optimized CSS at build time, resulting in smaller bundle sizes and better performance.