Head-to-Head: Aphrodite vs Semantic UI Analysis


v2.4.0(about 4 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Aphrodite is a JavaScript library for styling web applications. It provides an inline styling system that generates CSS at runtime. Unlike traditional CSS, Aphrodite provides a way to define styles dynamically using JavaScript objects. This allows for granular control over styles and enables styling based on dynamic data.

Alternatives: styled-components, emotion, jss

Tags: javascriptcss-in-jsstylingruntime-css


v2.5.0(12 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/semantic-uiNumber of direct dependencies: 33Monthly npm downloads

Semantic UI is a comprehensive front-end development framework that utilizes human-friendly HTML to create responsive, mobile-friendly websites. The framework provides a wide range of UI components, including buttons, menus, forms, and modals, along with many pre-built themes that can be customized to suit your project. Semantic UI is also built with accessibility in mind, adhering to WAI-ARIA standards to ensure compatibility with assistive technologies like screen readers.

Alternatives: bootstrap, foundation, tailwindcss

Tags: htmlcssjavascriptfront-endresponsive-designaccessibility



Semantic UI has a significantly higher level of popularity compared to Aphrodite. Semantic UI has a large community and is widely used in the industry. Aphrodite, on the other hand, has a smaller user base and is less popular.

Styling Approach

Aphrodite is a CSS-in-JS library that provides a way to write and manage styles directly in JavaScript components. It uses inline styles and generates class names dynamically at runtime. Semantic UI, on the other hand, is a UI component library with predefined CSS classes. It follows the traditional approach of defining styles in CSS and applying those classes to components.


Aphrodite allows for more flexibility in customizing styles as styles are defined using JavaScript objects. This allows for dynamic and conditional styling based on component props or state. Semantic UI provides a large set of predefined styles and themes, making it easy to create consistent UI designs. However, customizing these styles requires overriding or extending the predefined CSS classes.

Component Ecosystem

Semantic UI provides a comprehensive set of ready-to-use UI components. It offers a wide range of components for various purposes, such as buttons, forms, modals, and navigation. Aphrodite, on the other hand, is primarily focused on providing styling capabilities and does not offer a built-in component library. Developers using Aphrodite would need to build their own components or rely on other UI component libraries alongside Aphrodite.


Aphrodite can be easily integrated into any JavaScript or React project as it is a standalone library. It does not have any dependencies other than React itself. Semantic UI, on the other hand, is a complete UI framework with its own set of dependencies. Integrating Semantic UI requires setting up the framework and importing the required components and CSS styles.

Learning Curve

Aphrodite has a relatively lower learning curve since it leverages familiar JavaScript syntax for styling and does not introduce new concepts. Semantic UI, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive API and the need to learn its class-based CSS approach.