Head-to-Head: Aphrodite vs Material Design Lite Analysis
v2.4.0(about 4 years ago)
Alternatives: styled-components, emotion, jss
v1.3.0(almost 7 years ago)
Material Design Lite (MDL) is a lightweight front-end framework that implements Material Design, Google's design language. It offers a range of pre-built UI components and provides easy-to-follow guidelines for designing clean and modern web interfaces. With MDL, you can quickly and easily create responsive websites and web apps that are both visually appealing and easy to use.
Material Design Lite (MDL) has been widely used and has a larger user base compared to Aphrodite. MDL is a well-established library backed by Google, while Aphrodite is a more niche library.
Aphrodite is a CSS-in-JS library, specifically designed for React applications. It provides a powerful API for dynamically generating CSS styles at runtime. On the other hand, Material Design Lite is a front-end framework that focuses on providing ready-to-use components and styles inspired by the Material Design guidelines.
Aphrodite allows for dynamic and programmatic customization of styles, making it more flexible for complex styling requirements. Material Design Lite offers a set of predefined styles and components, which can be customized to a certain extent using CSS overrides.
Aphrodite creates inline styles at runtime, which can cause a slight overhead in terms of performance compared to traditional static CSS stylesheets. Material Design Lite generates static CSS files for its components, resulting in faster initial page loading times.
Community and Support
Material Design Lite has a larger community and ecosystem, with more resources, documentation, and community-driven support available. Aphrodite, although smaller in size, still has an active community and ongoing development.