Head-to-Head: Aphrodite vs JSS Analysis

aphrodite

v2.4.0(almost 5 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Aphrodite is a JavaScript library for managing CSS styles in a dynamic and efficient way. It allows developers to write styles using JavaScript objects and provides a unique approach to inline styles by generating CSS classes at runtime. Aphrodite offers features like automatic vendor prefixing, media queries, and pseudo-selectors, making it easy to create responsive and cross-browser compatible styles.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
glamorous+
jss+
linaria+
styletron+
goober+
stitches+
treat+
fela+

Tags: javascriptcssstylesdynamic-stylingperformance

jss

v10.10.0(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 4Monthly npm downloads

JSS is a powerful JavaScript library for creating and managing CSS styles using JavaScript objects. It allows developers to write styles in a more dynamic and flexible way, enabling them to easily generate unique class names, handle media queries, and use variables and functions within their styles. JSS provides a seamless integration with popular frameworks like React and Vue, making it a preferred choice for styling components in modern web applications.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
linaria+
aphrodite+
glamor+
styletron+
goober+
stitches+
fela+
radium+

Tags: javascriptcssstylingreactvue

Fight!

Popularity

Both Aphrodite and JSS are popular CSS-in-JS libraries, but Aphrodite has been around for longer and has a larger user base. JSS, however, has gained popularity in recent years and is widely used in the JavaScript community.

Approach

Aphrodite follows a more traditional approach to CSS-in-JS, where styles are defined using JavaScript objects and injected into the DOM at runtime. JSS, on the other hand, uses a more dynamic and flexible approach, allowing styles to be defined using JavaScript, JSON, or even CSS syntax.

Performance

Both libraries have good performance, but Aphrodite is known for its highly optimized runtime and efficient style caching mechanism. JSS also performs well, but it may have a slightly higher runtime overhead due to its dynamic nature.

Integration

Aphrodite is primarily designed for use with React and provides seamless integration with React components. JSS, on the other hand, is framework-agnostic and can be used with any JavaScript framework or library.

Developer Experience

Aphrodite provides a simple and intuitive API for defining and managing styles. It also offers support for CSS-like features such as media queries and pseudo-classes. JSS, on the other hand, provides a more powerful and flexible API with advanced features like theming, plugins, and dynamic styles.

Community and Documentation

Both libraries have active communities and good documentation. Aphrodite has been around for longer, so it has a larger community and more resources available. JSS, however, has a growing community and its documentation is comprehensive and well-maintained.