Head-to-Head: Aphrodite vs Foundation Analysis


v2.4.0(about 4 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Aphrodite is a JavaScript library for styling web applications. It provides an inline styling system that generates CSS at runtime. Unlike traditional CSS, Aphrodite provides a way to define styles dynamically using JavaScript objects. This allows for granular control over styles and enables styling based on dynamic data.

Alternatives: styled-components, emotion, jss

Tags: javascriptcss-in-jsstylingruntime-css


v6.8.1(about 2 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Foundation Sites is a front-end framework for developing responsive websites. Foundation offers various components such as responsive grids, buttons, navigation menus, forms, and typography styles that are easy to customize. It also includes powerful plugins like an image slider, modal dialogs, and an equalizer component that makes it easy to ensure all elements in a row are the same height. Foundation's Sass-powered framework makes it easy to change the look and feel of your website by customizing the variables. Foundation Sites is an excellent choice for building a custom web design system with modular components, ensuring consistency and saving time.

Alternatives: Bootstrap, Materialize, Semantic UI

Tags: front-endframeworkresponsiveSassmodularcustomizable



Foundation-sites has a long history and is a popular front-end framework known for its comprehensive set of UI components and grid system. Aphrodite, on the other hand, is a CSS-in-JS library that focuses on providing a robust styling solution. While Foundation-sites is more widely used, Aphrodite has gained popularity among developers who prefer the CSS-in-JS approach.


Foundation-sites provides a wide range of ready-to-use UI components, including grids, navigation bars, forms, and more. It also offers built-in responsive design capabilities. Aphrodite, on the other hand, is focused solely on providing a powerful CSS-in-JS solution, allowing developers to write and manage styles directly in JavaScript. It doesn't provide UI components out-of-the-box.


Foundation-sites is a standalone front-end framework that can be used with any JavaScript framework or library, including React. It provides its own JavaScript plugins for enhanced functionality. Aphrodite, on the other hand, is designed specifically for integration with React. It offers a seamless integration experience and provides React-specific APIs for working with styles.


Foundation-sites is highly customizable and allows developers to modify its components and styles to match their project requirements. It also provides Sass variables for easy theming. Aphrodite, on the other hand, allows dynamic and runtime styling through JavaScript, providing greater flexibility in creating and modifying styles at runtime.

Learning Curve

Foundation-sites has a steeper learning curve due to the extensive set of features and components it provides. It requires learning its specific markup and class naming conventions. Aphrodite, on the other hand, is relatively easy to pick up for React developers, especially those already familiar with JavaScript and CSS concepts.


Foundation-sites, being a precompiled front-end framework, has optimized performance and is designed to provide fast loading and rendering. Aphrodite, as a CSS-in-JS library, introduces some overhead due to the runtime style computation. However, it offers optimizations like style caching to mitigate performance concerns.