Head-to-Head: Aphrodite vs Bootstrap Analysis


v2.4.0(about 4 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Aphrodite is a JavaScript library for styling web applications. It provides an inline styling system that generates CSS at runtime. Unlike traditional CSS, Aphrodite provides a way to define styles dynamically using JavaScript objects. This allows for granular control over styles and enables styling based on dynamic data.

Alternatives: styled-components, emotion, jss

Tags: javascriptcss-in-jsstylingruntime-css


v5.3.2(20 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/bootstrapNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Bootstrap is a popular front-end framework used to quickly design and develop responsive web pages and user interfaces. It provides a consistent set of styles, components, and Javascript plugins that simplify the process of developing websites and applications. Bootstrap is known for its simple and intuitive class-based grid system which makes aligning and positioning elements on a page easy. It also includes a huge library of pre-built components like navigation bars, forms, and buttons that can be customized with your own styles and colors.

Alternatives: foundation, bulma, materialize

Tags: front-endframeworkresponsivecomponentsgrid-system


Styling Approach

Aphrodite is a CSS-in-JS library that allows you to write inline styles in JavaScript, while Bootstrap is a CSS framework that provides pre-designed components and styles. Aphrodite gives you more control and flexibility over styling, whereas Bootstrap offers a more standardized and ready-to-use set of styles.


Bootstrap is an incredibly popular CSS framework and has a large community following. It has been widely adopted and has a vast ecosystem of resources, themes, and plugins. Aphrodite, on the other hand, is less popular and has a smaller community.


Aphrodite allows you to create highly customized styles for your components, as you define styles using JavaScript objects. Bootstrap, on the other hand, provides a set of predefined styles and components, which can be customized using CSS variables and SASS. While Bootstrap offers more out-of-the-box styling options, Aphrodite gives you more flexibility to create unique design systems.

Component Library

Bootstrap comes with a rich set of reusable components that are ready to be used in your projects. It provides a consistent design language and well-tested components such as buttons, navigation bars, forms, etc. Aphrodite, being a CSS-in-JS library, does not provide a prebuilt component library. However, you can build your own set of reusable components using Aphrodite's styling capabilities.

Learning Curve

Bootstrap has a relatively simple API and extensive documentation, making it easy to get started for beginners. Aphrodite, on the other hand, requires some understanding of CSS-in-JS concepts and a basic knowledge of JavaScript. It might have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with the CSS-in-JS approach.

Integration with Other Libraries

Aphrodite can be used with any JavaScript framework or library, while Bootstrap is primarily designed to work with HTML and jQuery. Aphrodite seamlessly integrates with React, Angular, or any other framework that uses a virtual DOM. If you are using React, Aphrodite can provide a more streamlined and efficient styling solution.