Head-to-Head: Alpine.js vs Hyperapp Analysis

alpinejs

v3.13.5(about 1 month ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/alpinejsNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Alpine.js is a lightweight JavaScript framework for building interactive web interfaces. It focuses on providing a declarative syntax and minimal setup, allowing developers to enhance their HTML with dynamic behavior without the need for a complex build process or heavy framework.

Alternatives:
stimulus+
petite-vue+
htmx+
mithril.js+
dompurify+
greensock+
svelte+
vue+
preact+
inferno+

Tags: javascriptframeworkinteractivedeclarativelightweight

hyperapp

v2.0.22(almost 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Hyperapp is a lightweight JavaScript library for building web applications. It follows a functional programming paradigm and provides a simple and declarative API for creating user interfaces. Hyperapp focuses on simplicity and minimalism, allowing developers to build applications without the need for complex tooling or a large bundle size.

Alternatives:
preact+
mithril+
alpinejs+
lit+
svelte+
solid-js+
riot+
inferno+
vue+
react+

Tags: javascriptframeworkfunctional-programminguser-interfacevirtual-dom

Fight!

Popularity

Both Alpine.js and Hyperapp are popular JavaScript frameworks, but they have different levels of popularity within the JavaScript community. Alpine.js has gained significant popularity in recent years due to its lightweight nature and simplicity. Hyperapp, on the other hand, has a smaller but dedicated community of users.

Size

Alpine.js is known for its small size, weighing only a few kilobytes. It is designed to be lightweight and minimalistic, making it a great choice for small projects or when you want to keep your bundle size as small as possible. Hyperapp is also relatively small in size, but it is slightly larger than Alpine.js.

Functionality

Alpine.js is primarily focused on enhancing interactivity and adding behavior to existing HTML, similar to what jQuery does. It provides a declarative syntax for adding dynamic behavior to your HTML templates. Hyperapp, on the other hand, is a full-featured JavaScript framework inspired by Elm and Redux. It provides a state management system, virtual DOM, and a component-based architecture.

Developer Experience

Alpine.js has a very low learning curve and is easy to get started with. It doesn't require a build step or complex setup, making it suitable for small projects or when you want to quickly add interactivity to your existing HTML. Hyperapp, being a full-featured framework, has a steeper learning curve and requires a build step to transpile and bundle your code. It provides a more structured and opinionated development experience.

Community and Ecosystem

Alpine.js has a growing community and a small but active ecosystem of plugins and extensions. It integrates well with other JavaScript libraries and frameworks. Hyperapp, although smaller in terms of community size, has a dedicated community and a growing ecosystem of plugins and tools. It also has a strong focus on functional programming and immutability.

Performance

Both Alpine.js and Hyperapp are designed to be performant. Alpine.js, being lightweight and minimalistic, has a smaller footprint and faster initialization time. Hyperapp, with its virtual DOM and state management system, provides efficient rendering and updates. However, the performance difference between the two may not be significant for most use cases.