Head-to-Head: Stitches React vs Fela Analysis

@stitches/react

v1.2.8(over 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

@stitches/react is a CSS-in-JS library that offers a seamless way to style React components using a minimalistic and high-performance approach. It provides a utility-first API for defining styles with a focus on developer experience and maintainability. With @stitches/react, you can create dynamic and responsive designs by composing styles using a constraint-based system.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
goober+
twin.macro+
linaria+
styletron-react+
jss+
aphrodite+
glamorous+
radium+

Tags: css-in-jsreactstylingutility-firstresponsive-design

fela

v12.2.1(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 5Monthly npm downloads

Fela is a high-performance, framework-agnostic styling library for React and other JavaScript frameworks. It follows a functional and atomic CSS approach, allowing you to create dynamic and responsive styles using JavaScript objects. Fela's unique feature is its ability to generate atomic CSS classes on the fly, resulting in smaller CSS bundles and improved performance.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
jss+
glamor+
aphrodite+
styletron+
radium+
linaria+
goober+
stitches+

Tags: javascriptstylingreactatomic-cssperformance

Fight!

Popularity

Both @stitches/react and Fela are popular CSS-in-JS libraries, but Fela has been around for longer and has a larger user base and community support. However, @stitches/react has gained popularity in recent years due to its simplicity and performance.

Size

@stitches/react is known for its small bundle size and efficient runtime performance. It is designed to generate minimal CSS code and has a small footprint. Fela, on the other hand, has a larger codebase and may result in a slightly larger bundle size.

Developer Experience

@stitches/react provides a highly intuitive and developer-friendly API. It offers a styled API similar to CSS-in-JS libraries like styled-components, making it easy to write and maintain styles. Fela, on the other hand, has a more functional and modular approach, which may require a steeper learning curve for some developers.

Performance

Both @stitches/react and Fela are performant CSS-in-JS libraries. However, @stitches/react is known for its optimized runtime performance and efficient CSS generation. It uses a runtime CSS-in-JS solution, which eliminates the need for additional build steps. Fela, on the other hand, provides a more flexible and customizable approach, but may require additional configuration for optimal performance.

Features

Both libraries offer a wide range of features for styling React components. @stitches/react provides a comprehensive set of features including theming, responsive design, and CSS variables. Fela, on the other hand, offers a more modular and extensible architecture, allowing developers to customize and extend its functionality as per their requirements.

Community and Ecosystem

Fela has a larger and more established community with a wide range of plugins and integrations available. It has been adopted by many popular libraries and frameworks. @stitches/react, although relatively newer, has been gaining traction and has an active community. It provides good documentation and support, but its ecosystem is still growing.