Head-to-Head: Stitches React vs Aphrodite Analysis
v1.2.8(over 1 year ago)
Alternatives: styled-components, emotion, radium
v2.4.0(about 4 years ago)
Alternatives: styled-components, emotion, jss
@stitches/react and Aphrodite are both popular npm packages in the React ecosystem, but they have different levels of popularity. Aphrodite has been around for longer and has established itself as a popular choice for styling in React projects. However, @stitches/react is a newer package that has gained attention and popularity for its innovative approach to styling in React.
In terms of performance, Aphrodite performs well as it generates CSS classes at runtime and leverages the browser's built-in style sheet caching. However, @stitches/react provides excellent performance optimizations. It generates atomic CSS, which means each style rule is represented as a unique class and can be reused throughout the application. This reduces CSS duplication and improves rendering performance.
@stitches/react provides a great developer experience with its familiar CSS syntax and powerful features like theming and TypeScript support. It also has comprehensive documentation and a growing community. Aphrodite, being an established package, also has good documentation and community support, but lacks some modern features and syntax enhancements that @stitches/react offers.
Both packages can be easily integrated into a React project. Aphrodite integrates seamlessly with React and works well with other styling solutions like CSS modules. @stitches/react is specifically designed for React and provides a smooth integration process. It also supports integration with popular UI component libraries like Material-UI and Tailwind CSS.