Head-to-Head: Stitches vs UIkit Analysis

@stitches/core

v1.2.8(almost 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

@stitches/core is a powerful CSS-in-JS library that allows you to write CSS styles using JavaScript. It provides a simple and intuitive API for defining styles and generating optimized CSS code at runtime. With @stitches/core, you can easily create reusable style utilities, responsive styles, and dynamic styles based on props or state.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
goober+
linaria+
styletron+
jss+
treat+
astroturf+
vanilla-extract+
fela+

Tags: javascriptcss-in-jsstylingperformanceoptimization

uikit

v3.19.0(1 day ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/uikitNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

UIKit is a lightweight and modular front-end framework for building responsive and mobile-first web interfaces. It provides a comprehensive set of CSS and JavaScript components that can be easily customized and combined to create modern and visually appealing websites.

Alternatives:
bootstrap+
bulma+
foundation-sites+
semantic-ui+
tailwindcss+
materialize-css+
spectre.css+
tachyons+
primer-css+
purecss+

Tags: javascriptcssfront-endresponsivemobile-first

Fight!

Popularity

Both @stitches/core and uikit are popular npm packages, but they cater to different audiences. @stitches/core is a CSS-in-JS library that has gained popularity among developers who prefer a more lightweight and minimalistic approach to styling. uikit, on the other hand, is a comprehensive UI framework that offers a wide range of pre-built components and styles, making it popular among developers who want a more opinionated and feature-rich solution.

Size

@stitches/core is designed to be a lightweight CSS-in-JS library, focusing on minimal bundle size and runtime performance. It provides a small footprint and allows for fine-grained control over the generated CSS. uikit, being a comprehensive UI framework, has a larger codebase and includes a wide range of pre-built components and styles, resulting in a larger bundle size.

Flexibility

@stitches/core offers a high level of flexibility, allowing developers to write their own custom CSS-in-JS solutions and providing a powerful API for styling components. It is highly customizable and can be integrated into any JavaScript framework or library. uikit, on the other hand, provides a more opinionated approach with a set of pre-designed components and styles. While it offers some customization options, it may not be as flexible as @stitches/core for highly specific styling requirements.

Functionality

Both @stitches/core and uikit provide a rich set of features and functionalities. @stitches/core focuses on providing a powerful CSS-in-JS solution with features like theming, responsive styles, and CSS variables. uikit, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive UI framework with a wide range of pre-built components, responsive layouts, and utility classes. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the project and the level of customization required.

Developer Experience

@stitches/core provides a developer-friendly API and has good documentation, making it easy to get started and integrate into projects. It also has a growing community and active maintainers. uikit, being a more comprehensive UI framework, offers a more opinionated development experience with a set of pre-designed components and styles. It has extensive documentation and a large community, which can be beneficial for developers looking for ready-to-use components and a more guided development experience.

Maintenance

Both @stitches/core and uikit are actively maintained by their respective communities. However, it's worth noting that @stitches/core is a relatively newer library compared to uikit, which has been around for a longer time and has a larger user base. This can be a factor to consider when evaluating long-term maintenance and support for the packages.