Head-to-Head: Stitches vs Aphrodite Analysis

@stitches/core

v1.2.8(almost 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

@stitches/core is a powerful CSS-in-JS library that allows you to write CSS styles using JavaScript. It provides a simple and intuitive API for defining styles and generating optimized CSS code at runtime. With @stitches/core, you can easily create reusable style utilities, responsive styles, and dynamic styles based on props or state.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
goober+
linaria+
styletron+
jss+
treat+
astroturf+
vanilla-extract+
fela+

Tags: javascriptcss-in-jsstylingperformanceoptimization

aphrodite

v2.4.0(over 4 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Aphrodite is a JavaScript library for inline styling in React applications. It provides a convenient way to define and apply styles directly within your components using JavaScript objects. Aphrodite uses CSS-in-JS approach, allowing you to write styles in JavaScript and have them automatically converted to CSS at runtime.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
glamorous+
jss+
linaria+
styletron+
goober+
stitches+
treat+
typestyle+

Tags: javascriptreactstylingcss-in-jsperformance

Fight!

Popularity

Both @stitches/core and aphrodite are popular CSS-in-JS libraries, but aphrodite has been around for longer and has a larger community following and adoption.

Approach

@stitches/core is a relatively new CSS-in-JS library that focuses on providing a runtime-first approach, offering minimal runtime overhead and optimal performance. Aphrodite, on the other hand, uses an inline styles approach where styles are defined within JavaScript objects and injected at runtime.

Ease of Use

Aphrodite is easy to set up and has a simple API, making it accessible to developers of all levels of expertise. @stitches/core, while more powerful, may require a slightly steeper learning curve due to its more sophisticated configuration options and features.

Performance

@stitches/core is designed with performance in mind and aims to generate the smallest and most efficient CSS output possible. Aphrodite performs well but may have slightly higher runtime overhead due to its usage of inline styles and dynamic style injection.

Features

Both libraries offer a range of features for styling components. @stitches/core provides a powerful theming system, composability, and dynamic styling capabilities. Aphrodite offers media queries, keyframes, and pseudo elements, making it more versatile for complex styling requirements.

Compatibility

Aphrodite is compatible with all major JavaScript frameworks and libraries, including React, Vue.js, and Angular. @stitches/core is primarily designed for React but can be used with other frameworks by manually adapting it.

Documentation and Community Support

Aphrodite has extensive documentation and a larger established community, providing a wealth of resources and community support. @stitches/core is newer but has been gaining popularity, and while its documentation is relatively comprehensive, the community support may be slightly more limited in comparison.

Maintenance

@stitches/core is actively maintained by its creator, and the community actively contributes to its development. Aphrodite is also well-maintained, with regular updates and bug fixes.