Head-to-Head: Stitches vs Aphrodite Analysis

@stitches/core

v1.2.8(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

@stitches/core is a modern CSS-in-JS library that offers a seamless way to style your components using JavaScript. It provides a powerful API for defining styles with a focus on performance and developer experience. Stitches allows you to write CSS directly in your JavaScript code, enabling better encapsulation and reusability of styles. It also supports theming, responsive design, and server-side rendering.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
goober+
linaria+
styletron+
jss+
treat+
astroturf+
vanilla-extract+
typestyle+

Tags: css-in-jsstylingjavascriptthemingperformance

aphrodite

v2.4.0(almost 5 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Aphrodite is a JavaScript library for managing CSS styles in a dynamic and efficient way. It allows developers to write styles using JavaScript objects and provides a unique approach to inline styles by generating CSS classes at runtime. Aphrodite offers features like automatic vendor prefixing, media queries, and pseudo-selectors, making it easy to create responsive and cross-browser compatible styles.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
glamorous+
jss+
linaria+
styletron+
goober+
stitches+
treat+
fela+

Tags: javascriptcssstylesdynamic-stylingperformance

Fight!

Popularity

Aphrodite has been around for longer and has been widely used in the React community. On the other hand, Stitches is a newer library but has gained popularity due to its innovative approach to styling in React applications.

Styling Approach

Aphrodite uses inline styles with a JavaScript object approach, which can sometimes lead to performance issues due to the dynamic nature of styles. Stitches, on the other hand, uses a CSS-in-JS approach with a focus on static extraction at build time, which can lead to better performance and smaller bundle sizes.

Developer Experience

Stitches provides a more ergonomic and modern API for styling components, making it easier to work with and maintain styles in large codebases. Aphrodite, while powerful, may require a steeper learning curve due to its inline style approach.

Performance

Stitches' static extraction approach at build time can lead to better performance as styles are precompiled and optimized. Aphrodite's dynamic style generation at runtime may impact performance, especially in complex applications with frequent style changes.

Community Support

Aphrodite has a larger community and has been battle-tested in various projects, providing a wealth of resources and support. Stitches, being newer, is rapidly growing its community and has active maintainers who are responsive to issues and feature requests.