Head-to-Head: Linaria vs MaterializeCSS Analysis

@linaria/core

v5.0.2(6 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

@linaria/core is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS library for styling JavaScript applications. It allows you to write CSS code directly in your JavaScript files using tagged template literals. This approach provides better performance and eliminates the need for a separate build step or runtime dependencies.

Alternatives: styled-components, emotion, css-modules

Tags: javascriptcss-in-jsstylingperformancescoped-styles

materialize-css

v1.0.0(about 5 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/materialize-cssNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Materialize CSS is a modern and responsive CSS framework based on Google's Material Design guidelines. It provides a wide range of ready-to-use UI components, such as forms, buttons, cards and navigation menus, that can be easily customized to fit your website's style. Materialize CSS also includes Javascript components, such as modals and dropdowns, that enhance the user experience. This package is simple to use and integrate, making it a popular choice for quickly building visually appealing, mobile-first websites.

Alternatives: bootstrap, foundation, bulma

Tags: cssgooglematerial-designresponsiveui-components

Fight!

Popularity

@linaria/core is a CSS-in-JS library that has gained popularity in the React community, especially for its ability to extract styles at build-time and produce optimized CSS. Materialize CSS, on the other hand, is a widely used CSS framework that provides a comprehensive set of pre-built UI components. Materialize CSS has been popular for a long time and is widely used in various projects.

Size

@linaria/core is designed to generate minimal, optimized styles by extracting and stitching them during the build process. It results in smaller bundle sizes as only the necessary CSS is included. Materialize CSS, being a more comprehensive UI framework, has a larger file size due to the included CSS and pre-built components.

Flexibility

@linaria/core is highly flexible, allowing developers to write CSS-in-JS styles using plain JavaScript or TypeScript. It supports dynamic styling and can integrate with any JavaScript framework, not just React. Materialize CSS, on the other hand, provides a predefined set of UI components and styles, which may limit flexibility and customization options.

Functionality

@linaria/core primarily focuses on providing CSS-in-JS capabilities. It offers features like automatic critical CSS splitting, deduplication, and code elimination. Materialize CSS, on the other hand, offers a wide range of pre-built UI components, including grids, forms, buttons, navigation, modals, and more. It provides comprehensive styling and interaction options out-of-the-box.

Developer Experience

@linaria/core provides a seamless developer experience by allowing developers to write CSS-in-JS styles directly in their JavaScript or TypeScript code. It offers strong type support, easy composition, and is compatible with modern tooling like webpack and Babel. Materialize CSS provides a user-friendly and intuitive development experience by offering ready-to-use UI components and styles. It may require less initial setup and allows developers to quickly prototype and build UI.

Maintenance

@linaria/core is actively maintained and has a growing community. It releases frequent updates and improvements to enhance performance and add new features. Materialize CSS is also well-maintained and has been around for a long time, ensuring stability and regular updates. Both packages have good community support and issue tracking.