Head-to-Head: Harlem vs Little State Machine Analysis
@harlem/core
v3.1.8(9 months ago)
@harlem/core is a state management library for JavaScript applications. It provides a simple and intuitive API for managing application state and handling state changes. With @harlem/core, you can easily define and update reactive state variables, create computed properties, and subscribe to state changes.
little-state-machine is a lightweight state management library for JavaScript applications. It provides a simple and intuitive API for managing and sharing state across different components or modules in your application. With little-state-machine, you can easily create and update global state variables, subscribe to changes, and trigger actions based on state updates.
Both @harlem/core and little-state-machine are popular state management libraries within the JavaScript community. However, little-state-machine has gained more popularity and attention in recent years due to its simplicity and ease of use.
Size
@harlem/core is a lightweight state management library that focuses on providing a minimalistic API. On the other hand, little-state-machine is a bit larger in size due to its additional features and functionalities.
Architecture
@harlem/core follows a more traditional approach to state management, where state is managed using stores and actions. little-state-machine, on the other hand, utilizes the concept of a global state machine, making it easier to manage and share state across different components.
Integration with React
Both @harlem/core and little-state-machine are compatible with React applications. However, little-state-machine provides a more seamless integration experience by leveraging React hooks extensively. It offers a built-in useStore hook that simplifies state management and reduces boilerplate code.
Developer Experience
little-state-machine aims to provide a developer-friendly experience by offering a simple and intuitive API. It has comprehensive documentation and good community support. @harlem/core also provides a good developer experience, but it may have a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with the store-action architecture.
Extensibility
Both libraries are designed to be extendable and allow for customizations. However, little-state-machine provides more flexibility in terms of middleware integration and custom event handling. It also supports plugins, which can be used to add additional functionality to the state management setup.