Head-to-Head: Emotion vs MaterializeCSS Analysis


v11.11.2(about 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 5Monthly npm downloads

@emotion/css is a popular CSS-in-JS library that allows developers to style their components using JavaScript. It provides a powerful and flexible way to manage styles by enabling the use of template literals for writing CSS directly within JavaScript code. @emotion/css offers features like nested selectors, global styles, and theming support, making it easy to create dynamic and responsive styles for web applications.


Tags: css-in-jsstylingjavascriptreactive-stylestheming


v1.0.0(almost 6 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/materialize-cssNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Materialize CSS is a modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design principles. It provides a clean and intuitive user interface design with ready-to-use components like buttons, forms, cards, and navigation elements. Materialize CSS offers a grid system for easy layout structuring and responsive design, making it suitable for building mobile-first websites and web applications.


Tags: cssframeworkresponsivematerial-designcomponents



Both @emotion/css and materialize-css are well-known and widely used npm packages, but they have different target audiences. @emotion/css is commonly used within the React and JavaScript communities, especially in combination with the Emotion CSS-in-JS library. materialize-css, on the other hand, is a popular CSS framework that can be used with any web application, regardless of the underlying framework.


In terms of scalability, @emotion/css offers better modularity and scalability due to its CSS-in-JS approach. When using @emotion/css, styles are scoped to the relevant components, reducing the risk of style conflicts and making it easier to manage styles in large codebases. materialize-css, being a CSS framework, provides pre-defined styles and components, which may not be as flexible or scalable for highly customized designs or complex applications.


In terms of performance, @emotion/css has a slight overhead due to the CSS-in-JS runtime, which generates and injects styles dynamically at runtime. This overhead is typically negligible for small to medium-sized applications, but it may be a concern for larger applications or performance-critical scenarios. materialize-css, being a CSS framework, generates static stylesheets that are loaded upfront, resulting in faster initial rendering. However, the overall impact on performance will depend on the specific use case and implementation details.

Developer Experience

Both packages offer a good developer experience, but they have different approaches. @emotion/css embraces the CSS-in-JS paradigm, providing a powerful API for defining and managing styles directly in the component code. It also integrates seamlessly with popular JavaScript frameworks like React. On the other hand, materialize-css follows a more traditional approach of applying styles via CSS classes. It provides a large set of pre-styled components and utilities, making it easy to quickly build visually appealing interfaces without writing much custom CSS. The choice depends on personal preference and familiarity with the respective approaches.

Support and Documentation

Both @emotion/css and materialize-css have active communities and offer good support. @emotion/css is maintained by the Emotion project, which provides comprehensive documentation, examples, and a helpful community. materialize-css also has official documentation, a dedicated website, and a community that provides support and resources. In terms of the number of resources and tutorials available online, materialize-css may have a slight edge due to its popularity and longevity.