Head-to-Head: Emotion vs Bootstrap Analysis


v11.11.2(9 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 5Monthly npm downloads

@emotion/css is a popular CSS-in-JS library that allows you to write CSS styles in JavaScript. It provides a powerful and flexible way to style your components by leveraging the full power of JavaScript. With @emotion/css, you can write CSS styles using JavaScript objects or template literals, and it supports features like nesting, variables, and media queries.


Tags: javascriptcsscss-in-jsstylingcomponents


v5.3.3(10 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/bootstrapNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Bootstrap is a popular front-end framework for building responsive and mobile-first websites and web applications. It provides a collection of CSS and JavaScript components that can be easily customized and used to create modern and visually appealing user interfaces. With Bootstrap, developers can quickly prototype and build responsive layouts, navigation menus, forms, buttons, and much more.


Tags: javascriptcssfront-endresponsiveframework



Bootstrap is a widely popular CSS framework that has been around for a long time and has a large community following. It is widely used in web development projects. On the other hand, @emotion/css is a more recent library that focuses on providing a powerful and flexible CSS-in-JS solution. While it may not have the same level of popularity as Bootstrap, it has gained a significant following in the React community.


Bootstrap is a comprehensive CSS framework that includes a wide range of pre-built components and styles. As a result, it has a larger file size compared to @emotion/css, which is a more lightweight library that focuses on providing a CSS-in-JS solution. If file size is a concern, @emotion/css might be a better choice.


Bootstrap provides a set of predefined styles and components that can be easily customized using its extensive set of configuration options. It offers a consistent and cohesive design system out of the box. On the other hand, @emotion/css allows for more granular and flexible customization, as it enables you to write CSS directly in your JavaScript code. This can be beneficial if you have specific design requirements or prefer a more tailored approach.

Integration with React

Both @emotion/css and Bootstrap can be used with React. However, @emotion/css is specifically designed to work well with React and provides a seamless integration. It allows you to write CSS-in-JS directly in your React components, making it easy to manage styles and component-specific CSS. Bootstrap, on the other hand, requires additional setup and may not provide the same level of integration and convenience as @emotion/css for React projects.

Community and Ecosystem

Bootstrap has a large and established community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. It also has a wide range of third-party themes, plugins, and extensions that can be easily integrated into your project. @emotion/css, while not as widely adopted as Bootstrap, has a growing community and offers good documentation and support. It also integrates well with other libraries and tools in the React ecosystem.

Flexibility and Extensibility

Bootstrap provides a comprehensive set of pre-built components and styles, which makes it easy to quickly build a visually appealing website. However, it may be less flexible and extensible compared to @emotion/css, which allows you to create custom styles and components using JavaScript. If you require a high level of customization and flexibility, @emotion/css might be a better choice.