Head-to-Head: Emotion vs Aphrodite Analysis

@emotion/css

v11.11.2(about 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 5Monthly npm downloads

@emotion/css is a popular CSS-in-JS library that allows developers to style their components using JavaScript. It provides a powerful and flexible way to manage styles by enabling the use of template literals for writing CSS directly within JavaScript code. @emotion/css offers features like nested selectors, global styles, and theming support, making it easy to create dynamic and responsive styles for web applications.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
linaria+
goober+
stitches+
twin.macro+
emotion+
@emotion/react+
aphrodite+
glamor+
styletron+

Tags: css-in-jsstylingjavascriptreactive-stylestheming

aphrodite

v2.4.0(almost 5 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Aphrodite is a JavaScript library for managing CSS styles in a dynamic and efficient way. It allows developers to write styles using JavaScript objects and provides a unique approach to inline styles by generating CSS classes at runtime. Aphrodite offers features like automatic vendor prefixing, media queries, and pseudo-selectors, making it easy to create responsive and cross-browser compatible styles.

Alternatives:
emotion+
styled-components+
glamorous+
jss+
linaria+
styletron+
goober+
stitches+
treat+
fela+

Tags: javascriptcssstylesdynamic-stylingperformance

Fight!

Popularity

Both @emotion/css and Aphrodite are popular CSS-in-JS libraries in the React ecosystem. However, @emotion/css has gained more popularity in recent years due to its performance and developer experience.

Performance

@emotion/css is known for its excellent performance due to its use of runtime styles and CSS-in-JS optimizations. Aphrodite, on the other hand, generates CSS at runtime, which can impact performance in larger applications.

Developer Experience

@emotion/css provides a more modern and ergonomic API, making it easier to work with styles in React components. It also supports features like theming and global styles out of the box. Aphrodite, while powerful, may have a steeper learning curve and a more verbose API.

Flexibility

@emotion/css offers more flexibility in terms of styling approaches and customization options. It allows for various ways to define styles, including object styles, template literals, and global styles. Aphrodite, on the other hand, follows a more traditional CSS-in-JS approach with a focus on inline styles.

Community Support

@emotion/css has a larger and more active community compared to Aphrodite. This means that you are more likely to find resources, documentation, and community support when using @emotion/css.

Maintenance

@emotion/css is actively maintained and frequently updated to keep up with the latest trends and best practices in the CSS-in-JS space. Aphrodite, while still maintained, may not receive updates as frequently as @emotion/css.