Head-to-Head: Elder.js vs Sapper Analysis

@elderjs/elderjs

v1.8.0-beta.14(almost 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 19Monthly npm downloads

@elderjs/elderjs is a static site generator built on top of Svelte, Snowpack, and Rollup, designed for building fast and SEO-friendly websites. It offers a simple and flexible configuration, allowing developers to create dynamic content and layouts while generating static HTML files. Elder.js prioritizes performance and developer experience, providing features like server-side rendering, incremental builds, and automatic sitemap generation.

Alternatives:
sapper+
nuxt+
next+
gatsby+
blitz+
redwoodjs+
astro+
vitepress+
sveltekit+
remix+

Tags: static-site-generatorSvelteSEO-friendlyperformanceincremental-builds

sapper

v0.29.3(over 2 years ago)

This package is deprecated: SvelteKit is the successor to Sapper - https://kit.svelte.dev/The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 6Monthly npm downloads

Sapper is a framework for building server-rendered web applications with Svelte. It provides a powerful combination of Svelte's reactive components and server-side rendering capabilities, resulting in fast and SEO-friendly web applications. Sapper simplifies the development process by handling routing, code-splitting, and server-side rendering out of the box.

Alternatives:
sveltekit+
next.js+
nuxt+
gatsby+
blitz+
remix+
astro+
vite+
quasar+
redwoodjs+

Tags: frameworkserver-renderingwebSvelterouting

Fight!

Popularity

Sapper has been around for longer and has gained significant popularity within the Svelte community. On the other hand, Elder.js, while relatively newer, has also gained a growing user base and has been well-received in the static site generator space.

Scalability

Elder.js is designed specifically for building large-scale, production-ready websites with robust SEO capabilities. It offers built-in server rendering and static generation, making it suitable for scalable and performant applications. Sapper, on the other hand, is more geared towards smaller applications and may require additional configuration for larger projects.

Performance

Both Elder.js and Sapper perform well in terms of performance. Elder.js uses server-side rendering and efficient caching techniques to deliver fast-loading websites. Sapper, being built on top of Svelte, which is known for its small bundle size and fast runtime performance, also provides excellent performance.

Developer Experience

Sapper offers a smooth developer experience with its structured project layout and a rich set of built-in features like routing, code-splitting, and server-side rendering. Elder.js focuses on simplicity and ease of use, providing a minimalistic and straightforward API for developing static sites. It also offers a local development server with hot-reloading for a smooth development workflow.

Community and Ecosystem

Sapper has a larger and more established community due to its early adoption and association with the Svelte framework. It has a wider range of plugins, integrations, and resources available. Elder.js, while smaller, has an active and supportive community and a growing ecosystem of plugins and templates.

Learning Curve

Sapper may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its tight integration with Svelte and its unique project structure. Elder.js, being more focused on simplicity and conventional JavaScript practices, may be easier for developers new to static site generation.