Head-to-Head: Elder.js vs Astro Analysis


v1.8.0-beta.14(about 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 19Monthly npm downloads

@elderjs/elderjs is a modern and flexible static site generator built with Node.js. It provides a powerful and intuitive framework for creating static websites and blogs. Elder.js focuses on simplicity and performance, allowing developers to build fast and SEO-friendly websites with ease.

Alternatives: gatsby, next.js, 11ty

Tags: javascriptstatic-site-generatornode.jsserver-side-renderingplugin-based


v3.2.2(2 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 57Monthly npm downloads

Astro is a new, lightweight static site generator developed specifically for building modern websites. Its unique selling point is that it aims to eliminate the complexity associated with the build process, aiming to enable developers to concentrate on writing great code without worrying about how it will compile or how long it will take to deploy.

Alternatives: Gatsby, Next.js, Hugo

Tags: javascriptstatic-site-generatorcomponent-basedmodern-web-technologiesperformance



Both packages have gained popularity in the JavaScript community, but in different domains. @elderjs/elderjs is a popular framework for building server-rendered websites, particularly in the static site generation space. Astro, on the other hand, is a rising star in the world of static site generation and front-end development, known for its flexibility and performance.


The architecture of the two packages differs significantly. @elderjs/elderjs is a full-featured framework specifically designed for building server-rendered websites using technologies like Svelte, Rollup, and Elder.js. It focuses on providing a robust SSR-based website development experience. Astro, on the other hand, is a front-end build tool that allows you to create static websites or use server-side rendering with various front-end frameworks like React, Vue, and Svelte.

Developer Experience

Both packages prioritize developer experience, but in different ways. @elderjs/elderjs embraces convention over configuration, offering an opinionated approach to website development and providing a well-documented and easy-to-understand API. Astro, on the other hand, emphasizes flexibility and gives developers the freedom to choose their preferred front-end framework while providing a smooth development experience with fast server-side rendering and hot module reloading.

Community and Ecosystem

Both packages have active and growing communities. @elderjs/elderjs benefits from having a well-established community and an ecosystem of plugins and starters that can accelerate development. Astro, although relatively new, is backed by a strong community and has seen rapid growth since its release. It also has extensibility through its plugin system and a growing ecosystem of integrations with popular front-end tools and frameworks.


Both packages focus on performance, but in different ways. @elderjs/elderjs optimizes for server-side rendering and generating static HTML, resulting in fast initial page loads and SEO-friendly websites. Astro takes a different approach by using a build-time rendering strategy, generating highly optimized static pages that can be loaded instantly in the browser and dynamically hydrating them to provide an interactive user experience.

Learning Curve

The learning curve for both packages can vary. @elderjs/elderjs has a more straightforward learning curve, especially for developers familiar with Svelte and Rollup. It provides comprehensive documentation and follows a convention-based approach, making it easier to get started. Astro, on the other hand, may have a slightly steeper learning curve due to its flexibility and the potential need to learn additional front-end frameworks if not already familiar with them.