Head-to-Head: Docusaurus vs Hexo Analysis

@docusaurus/core

v3.4.0(21 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 68Monthly npm downloads

@docusaurus/core is a powerful tool for building and maintaining documentation websites. It provides a simple and customizable framework for creating static sites with a focus on documentation. With features like built-in search, versioning, and internationalization support, @docusaurus/core streamlines the process of creating and managing documentation projects.

Alternatives:
vuepress+
gatsby+
next+
nuxt+
hexo+
gitbook+
hugo+
jekyll+
sapper+
gridsome+

Tags: documentationwebsitestatic-sitegeneratoropen-source

hexo

v7.2.0(2 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 24Monthly npm downloads

Hexo is a fast, simple, and powerful static site generator built with Node.js. It allows you to create a blog or website with ease by converting markdown files into static HTML files. Hexo provides a customizable and flexible platform for content creation, supporting themes, plugins, and various configurations to tailor your site to your needs. With its built-in server, you can preview your site locally before deployment.

Alternatives:
vuepress+
gatsby+
docusaurus+
gridsome+
nuxt+
next+
hugo+
jekyll+
eleventy+
pelican+

Tags: node.jsstatic-site-generatorblogmarkdownhtml

Fight!

Popularity

Both @docusaurus/core and Hexo are popular static site generators. However, Hexo has been around for longer and has a larger user base and community support. @docusaurus/core, on the other hand, has gained popularity in recent years and is widely used for documentation websites.

Scalability

Both packages are scalable, but @docusaurus/core is specifically designed for building documentation websites and provides features like versioning, search functionality, and easy navigation. Hexo is more general-purpose and can be used for various types of websites, but may require additional plugins or configurations for specific documentation-related features.

Performance

In terms of performance, Hexo is known for its speed and efficiency. It generates static HTML files, which can be served quickly. @docusaurus/core also generates static files, but it includes additional features like client-side routing and dynamic content loading, which may impact performance to some extent.

Developer Experience

Both packages offer a good developer experience. @docusaurus/core is built on top of React and provides a modern and intuitive development workflow. It has a rich plugin ecosystem and offers a smooth development experience for creating documentation websites. Hexo, on the other hand, is based on Node.js and provides a simple and straightforward setup. It has a large number of themes and plugins available, making it easy to customize and extend.

Community and Support

Hexo has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, themes, and plugins available. It has been around for a longer time and has a more mature ecosystem. @docusaurus/core, although newer, has a growing community and active development. It has good documentation and support, especially for creating documentation websites.