Head-to-Head: Akita vs Zustand Analysis

@datorama/akita

v8.0.1(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

@datorama/akita is a state management pattern and library for Angular applications. It provides a simple and efficient way to manage application state using a minimalistic and intuitive API. Akita offers features like built-in support for entities, stores, and queries, making it easy to handle complex state management scenarios.

Alternatives:
mobx+
redux+
vuex+
ngxs+
easy-peasy+
zustand+
recoil+
effector+
overmind+
mobx-state-tree+

Tags: angularstate-managementlibraryentitiesqueries

zustand

v4.5.2(3 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Zustand is a minimalistic and straightforward state management library for React applications. It offers a simple and intuitive API for managing global state in a React component tree without the need for complex setups or boilerplate code. Zustand leverages React hooks and context under the hood to provide a lightweight yet powerful state management solution.

Alternatives:
redux+
mobx+
recoil+
jotai+
valtio+
effector+
easy-peasy+
pullstate+
react-query+
swr+

Tags: reactstate-managementreact-hookscontext-api

Fight!

Popularity

Both @datorama/akita and zustand are popular state management libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem. However, @datorama/akita has been around for longer and has a larger user base and community support.

Size

In terms of size, zustand is a smaller library compared to @datorama/akita. It has a minimalistic API and focuses on providing a lightweight state management solution. @datorama/akita, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive feature set, which results in a larger bundle size.

Developer Experience

Both libraries provide a good developer experience, but they have different approaches. @datorama/akita follows a more traditional, class-based approach and provides a set of predefined patterns and utilities for managing state. Zustand, on the other hand, embraces a hook-based approach and leverages the React hooks API for managing state, resulting in a more intuitive and declarative coding experience.

Functionality

Both @datorama/akita and zustand offer similar core functionalities for state management, such as state updates, subscriptions, and middleware support. However, @datorama/akita provides additional features like entity management, built-in devtools, and support for server-side rendering (SSR). Zustand, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and provides a minimalistic API without additional features.

Integration

Both libraries integrate well with React and can be used seamlessly in React applications. However, @datorama/akita has better support for Angular as it was initially developed for Angular applications. If you are using Angular, @datorama/akita might be a better choice due to its tighter integration with the Angular ecosystem.

Community and Documentation

Both @datorama/akita and zustand have active communities and provide good documentation. However, @datorama/akita has been around for longer and has a larger community, which means you may find more resources, tutorials, and community support for @datorama/akita.