Head-to-Head: Akita vs MobX Analysis

@datorama/akita

v8.0.1(about 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

@datorama/akita is a state management library for Angular applications. It provides a simple and efficient way to manage application state by using a minimalistic and intuitive API. Akita follows the principles of immutability and reactive programming, allowing developers to easily manage and update the state of their application.

Alternatives:
mobx+
redux+
vuex+
ngxs+
easy-peasy+
zustand+
recoil+
effector+
overmind+
mobx-state-tree+

Tags: javascriptangularstate-managementreactive-programmingimmutable

mobx

v6.12.0(3 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

MobX is a simple and scalable state management library for JavaScript applications. It provides a reactive and observable system that allows you to easily manage and synchronize the state of your application. With MobX, you can create observable objects, track changes to them, and automatically update any components that depend on those changes.

Alternatives:
redux+
vuex+
zustand+
recoil+
easy-peasy+
valtio+
effector+
jotai+
xstate+
akita+

Tags: javascriptstate-managementreactiveobservable

Fight!

Popularity

Both @datorama/akita and MobX are popular state management libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem. MobX has been around for longer and has a larger community and user base. However, @datorama/akita has gained popularity in recent years due to its simplicity and ease of use.

Architecture

@datorama/akita follows a more traditional and structured approach to state management. It is based on the principles of the Redux pattern and provides a centralized store with actions and mutations. MobX, on the other hand, is based on the concept of observables and reactive programming, allowing for more flexible and dynamic state management.

Developer Experience

Both libraries provide a good developer experience, but they have different approaches. @datorama/akita provides a more opinionated and structured approach, which can be beneficial for larger projects with complex state management needs. MobX, on the other hand, offers a more flexible and intuitive API, making it easier to get started and iterate quickly.

Performance

In terms of performance, MobX is known for its excellent reactivity system, which efficiently updates only the necessary components when the state changes. @datorama/akita also performs well, but it follows a more traditional approach and may require more manual optimizations for performance in certain scenarios.

Community and Ecosystem

Both @datorama/akita and MobX have active communities and ecosystems. MobX has a larger community and a wider range of community-contributed packages and integrations. @datorama/akita has a smaller but growing community and provides official plugins and extensions for common use cases.

Learning Curve

The learning curve for @datorama/akita is relatively low, especially if you are already familiar with Redux. It provides clear documentation and follows established patterns. MobX has a slightly steeper learning curve due to its reactive programming paradigm, but it offers a more flexible and powerful state management solution once you grasp the concepts.