Head-to-Head: Akita vs MobX Analysis

@datorama/akita

v8.0.1(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

@datorama/akita is a state management pattern and library for Angular applications. It provides a simple and efficient way to manage application state using a minimalistic and intuitive API. Akita offers features like built-in support for entities, stores, and queries, making it easy to handle complex state management scenarios.

Alternatives:
mobx+
redux+
vuex+
ngxs+
easy-peasy+
zustand+
recoil+
effector+
overmind+
mobx-state-tree+

Tags: angularstate-managementlibraryentitiesqueries

mobx

v6.12.4(6 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

MobX is a simple, scalable, and battle-tested state management library for React applications. It provides a reactive and transparent way to manage application state, making it easy to create reactive data models that automatically update components when the data changes. MobX follows the principle of minimalistic API and maximum performance, ensuring efficient state management without boilerplate code.

Alternatives:
redux+
vuex+
zustand+
recoil+
effector+
easy-peasy+
valtio+
jotai+
xstate+
akita+

Tags: javascriptreactstate-managementreactivemobx

Fight!

State Management

Both @datorama/akita and MobX are state management libraries for JavaScript applications. Akita is a state management pattern built on top of RxJS, providing a more structured and opinionated way to manage state. MobX, on the other hand, is a reactive state management library that allows you to create observable state and automatically tracks and updates components when the state changes.

Scalability

Akita is well-suited for large-scale applications due to its structured approach to state management. It provides tools like entity stores, queries, and actions that help in organizing and scaling the state. MobX is also scalable and performs well in large applications, especially when used with React, but it offers more flexibility which can sometimes lead to less structured code in very large projects.

Performance

Both Akita and MobX are known for their good performance. Akita's use of RxJS allows for efficient handling of state changes and updates. MobX's reactivity system ensures that only components that depend on a particular piece of state are re-rendered when that state changes, leading to optimal performance.

Developer Experience

Akita provides a more opinionated and structured approach to state management, which can be beneficial for developers looking for clear guidelines and patterns to follow. MobX, on the other hand, offers more flexibility and allows developers to manage state in a more intuitive and reactive way. The choice between the two depends on the developer's preference for structure versus flexibility.

Community and Ecosystem

MobX has a larger and more active community compared to Akita, which means there are more resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations available for MobX. However, Akita has a dedicated user base and is actively maintained by the Datorama team, ensuring its stability and longevity.