Head-to-Head: Akita vs Effector Analysis

@datorama/akita

v8.0.1(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

@datorama/akita is a state management pattern and library for Angular applications. It provides a simple and efficient way to manage application state using a minimalistic and intuitive API. Akita offers features like built-in support for entities, stores, and queries, making it easy to handle complex state management scenarios.

Alternatives:
mobx+
redux+
vuex+
ngxs+
easy-peasy+
zustand+
recoil+
effector+
overmind+
mobx-state-tree+

Tags: angularstate-managementlibraryentitiesqueries

effector

v23.2.2(29 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Effector is a state management library for JavaScript applications, focusing on predictable state management and efficient event handling. It provides a declarative way to define and update application state, making it easier to manage complex data flows and interactions. Effector offers features like stores, events, effects, and combinators to handle state changes and side effects in a clear and concise manner.

Alternatives:
redux+
mobx+
zustand+
recoil+
valtio+
jotai+
xstate+
akita+
easy-peasy+
overmind+

Tags: javascriptstate-managementeventseffectspredictable-state

Fight!

Popularity

Both @datorama/akita and effector are popular state management libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem. However, @datorama/akita has been around for longer and has a larger user base and community support.

Architecture

@datorama/akita follows a traditional centralized store architecture inspired by Redux, where the state is managed in a single store. On the other hand, effector introduces a different approach with its own reactive state management system, allowing for more fine-grained control over state updates and dependencies.

Developer Experience

Both libraries provide a good developer experience, but they have different approaches. @datorama/akita provides a simpler API and is easier to learn, especially if you are already familiar with Redux. Effector, on the other hand, has a more complex API and requires a deeper understanding of reactive programming concepts.

Performance

Effector is known for its excellent performance due to its efficient update propagation mechanism. It leverages a fine-grained dependency tracking system, which allows for optimized reactivity and minimal unnecessary updates. @datorama/akita also performs well, but it may not be as optimized for highly dynamic and deeply nested state structures as effector.

Integration

Both libraries can be integrated into various JavaScript frameworks and libraries. However, @datorama/akita has better integration with Angular, as it was initially developed with Angular in mind. Effector, on the other hand, is framework-agnostic and can be used with any JavaScript framework or library.

Community and Documentation

Both libraries have active communities and provide good documentation. However, @datorama/akita, being more established, has a larger community and more extensive documentation resources available.