Head-to-Head: Akita vs NGXS Analysis

@datorama/akita

v8.0.1(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

@datorama/akita is a state management pattern and library for Angular applications. It provides a simple and efficient way to manage application state using a minimalistic and intuitive API. Akita offers features like built-in support for entities, stores, and queries, making it easy to handle complex state management scenarios.

Alternatives:
mobx+
redux+
vuex+
ngxs+
easy-peasy+
zustand+
recoil+
effector+
overmind+
mobx-state-tree+

Tags: angularstate-managementlibraryentitiesqueries

@ngxs/store

v18.0.0(10 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

@ngxs/store is a state management library for Angular applications that leverages the power of RxJS observables and Angular's change detection. It provides a simple and efficient way to manage the state of your application by using a Redux-inspired pattern with actions, states, and selectors. @ngxs/store offers features like immutability, time-travel debugging, and plugin ecosystem support.

Alternatives:
@ngrx/store+
akita+
mobx-angular+
ngxs+
ngx-observable-store+
angular-redux/store+
@datorama/akita-ngdevtools+
@ngneat/elf+
@ngrx/component-store+
@rx-angular/state+

Tags: angularstate-managementrxjsreduxobservables

Fight!

State Management Approach

Akita follows a more traditional state management approach inspired by Redux, where the state is stored in a centralized store and updated through actions and reducers. NGXS, on the other hand, is more inspired by Angular's reactive programming style and uses observables to manage state changes.

Developer Experience

Akita provides a simpler and more straightforward API for state management, making it easier for developers to understand and use. NGXS, being more reactive, might have a steeper learning curve for developers new to reactive programming concepts.

Performance

Both libraries offer good performance, but Akita's immutability and efficient change detection mechanisms make it slightly more performant in scenarios with a large amount of state changes. NGXS's reliance on observables can sometimes introduce overhead, especially in complex state management scenarios.

Community and Ecosystem

NGXS has a larger community and ecosystem compared to Akita, which means more third-party plugins, tools, and resources are available for NGXS. Akita, however, has a more focused and streamlined approach, which can be beneficial for projects looking for a specific set of features without unnecessary complexity.

TypeScript Support

Both libraries have excellent TypeScript support, providing strong typing and good integration with Angular's TypeScript features. Developers working with TypeScript will find both Akita and NGXS to be suitable choices for type-safe state management.