Head-to-Head: Akita vs Harlem Analysis

@datorama/akita

v8.0.1(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

@datorama/akita is a state management pattern and library for Angular applications. It provides a simple and efficient way to manage application state using a minimalistic and intuitive API. Akita offers features like built-in support for entities, stores, and queries, making it easy to handle complex state management scenarios.

Alternatives:
mobx+
redux+
vuex+
ngxs+
easy-peasy+
zustand+
recoil+
effector+
overmind+
mobx-state-tree+

Tags: angularstate-managementlibraryentitiesqueries

@harlem/core

v3.1.8(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

@harlem/core is a state management library for JavaScript applications, offering a simple and efficient way to manage application state. It provides a centralized store for managing data and state changes, using a reactive approach to update components when the state changes. @harlem/core is lightweight and easy to integrate into projects, offering features like actions, mutations, and getters for manipulating state.

Alternatives:
@emotion/react+
styled-components+
jss+
linaria+
goober+
stitches+
styletron-react+
treat+
emotion+
astroturf+

Tags: javascriptstate-managementreactivestoreactions

Fight!

Popularity

Both @datorama/akita and @harlem/core are popular state management libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem. However, @datorama/akita has been around for longer and has a larger user base and community support.

Architecture

@datorama/akita follows the traditional Redux-like architecture with actions, stores, and selectors. It provides a more structured and opinionated approach to state management. On the other hand, @harlem/core takes a more lightweight and minimalistic approach, inspired by Zustand, and provides a simpler API for managing state.

Developer Experience

@datorama/akita provides a comprehensive set of tools and features for state management, including built-in support for entity management, caching, and devtools integration. It has good TypeScript support and offers a rich developer experience. @harlem/core, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It has a smaller API surface and is easier to learn and get started with.

Performance

Both libraries are performant, but @harlem/core is known for its lightweight footprint and efficient reactivity system. It leverages Proxy-based reactivity, which can provide better performance in certain scenarios. @datorama/akita also performs well and offers optimizations like memoized selectors and efficient change detection.

Community and Documentation

@datorama/akita has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. It has been widely adopted and has a strong ecosystem of plugins and extensions. @harlem/core, being a newer library, has a smaller community and fewer resources available, but it is actively maintained and has a growing community.

Integration and Compatibility

@datorama/akita is framework-agnostic and can be used with any JavaScript framework or library, including React, Angular, and Vue. It provides official integrations for popular frameworks. @harlem/core is primarily designed for React applications and provides seamless integration with React components and hooks.