Head-to-Head: Qwik vs Marko Analysis

@builder.io/qwik

v1.4.5(17 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 2Monthly npm downloads

@builder.io/qwik is a powerful and flexible JavaScript library for building fast and interactive web applications. It provides a modern and intuitive API for creating dynamic UI components and managing state. With qwik, you can easily build complex UIs with reusable components and efficiently handle data flow between components.

Alternatives:
solid-js+
svelte+
preact+
vue+
inferno+
lit+
alpinejs+
stencil+
marko+
mithril+

Tags: javascriptwebfrontenduistate-managementperformance

marko

v5.32.14(3 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 14Monthly npm downloads

Marko is a fast and lightweight JavaScript UI library for building web applications. It focuses on server-side rendering (SSR) and provides a highly efficient rendering engine that generates HTML on the server and sends it to the client. Marko offers a declarative syntax and component-based architecture, making it easy to create reusable and modular UI components.

Alternatives:
pug+
handlebars+
ejs+
mustache+
nunjucks+
hbs+
dustjs-linkedin+
doT+
twig+
squirrelly+

Tags: javascriptuiserver-side-renderingcomponent-basedperformance

Fight!

Popularity

Both `@builder.io/qwik` and `marko` are npm packages but they cater to different use cases and target different audiences. `marko` is a popular UI rendering library focused on server-rendered web applications, while `@builder.io/qwik` is a low-level library for building high-performance, interactive web apps. In terms of popularity, `marko` has a larger community and a longer history, while `@builder.io/qwik` is a newer and less widely adopted library.

Architecture

The architectural approaches of the two libraries differ significantly. `marko` follows a component-based approach and provides a declarative syntax similar to HTML templates, making it easy to build reusable UI components. On the other hand, `@builder.io/qwik` follows the Qwik framework architecture, which emphasizes fine-grained componentization and micro-frontends. It provides a reactive programming model and performs granular updates for better performance.

Performance

`@builder.io/qwik` is built with performance as a primary focus. It leverages fine-grained optimizations and implements a highly efficient rendering pipeline, resulting in fast loading and rendering times. `marko` also prioritizes performance, but it might not have the same level of optimizations and fine-grained control over rendering as `@builder.io/qwik`.

Developer Experience

Both libraries offer good developer experiences, but they have different approaches. `marko` provides a simple and intuitive templating syntax, along with helpful features like automatic updates when the template changes. It also offers good tooling support and integrations. `@builder.io/qwik` introduces a more advanced programming model and requires a learning curve to leverage its full potential. It aims to provide a highly efficient and scalable development experience once the concepts are mastered.

Community and Support

In terms of community size and support, `marko` has a larger and more established community, which means it is easier to find resources, tutorials, and community-driven solutions. `@builder.io/qwik` is newer and has a smaller community, so finding comprehensive resources and community-driven solutions might be more challenging. However, both libraries have active maintainers and provide support channels.