Head-to-Head: Qwik vs Ember Analysis

@builder.io/qwik

v1.7.1(16 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 2Monthly npm downloads

An Open-Source sub-framework designed with a focus on server-side-rendering, lazy-loading, and styling/animation.

ember-source

v5.10.1(14 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 41Monthly npm downloads

Ember Source is the core library of the Ember.js framework, providing a robust set of tools and conventions for building ambitious web applications. It offers features like two-way data binding, computed properties, routing, and a strong focus on developer ergonomics. Ember Source follows the convention over configuration principle, making it easy to get started with structured and scalable applications.

Alternatives:
vue+
react+
angular+
svelte+
preact+
lit+
stimulus+
alpinejs+
mithril+
marionette+

Tags: javascriptframeworkweb applicationsdata bindingrouting

Fight!

Popularity

Ember Source is a widely popular framework in the JavaScript community, especially for building ambitious web applications. On the other hand, @builder.io/qwik is a relatively newer package and may not have the same level of popularity as Ember Source.

Scalability

Ember Source is known for its scalability and is often used for large-scale applications. It provides a robust architecture and conventions that make it easier to manage complex codebases. @builder.io/qwik is also designed with scalability in mind, but being a newer package, it may not have been tested extensively in large-scale projects.

Performance

Ember Source has a strong focus on performance optimization and provides features like Glimmer rendering engine and FastBoot for server-side rendering. @builder.io/qwik also aims for performance optimization, but it may not have the same level of performance optimizations and tooling as Ember Source.

Developer Experience

Ember Source provides a comprehensive set of tools, conventions, and a well-defined project structure that can make development easier and more efficient. It has a strong emphasis on convention over configuration. @builder.io/qwik also provides a good developer experience with its declarative and component-based approach, but it may not have the same level of tooling and community support as Ember Source.

Learning Curve

Ember Source has a steeper learning curve compared to @builder.io/qwik. It has its own set of conventions and concepts that developers need to learn and follow. @builder.io/qwik, being a newer package, may have a more approachable learning curve and may be easier to get started with.

Community and Ecosystem

Ember Source has a large and active community with a rich ecosystem of addons, plugins, and resources. It has been around for a long time and has a mature ecosystem. @builder.io/qwik, being newer, may not have the same level of community and ecosystem support as Ember Source.