Head-to-Head: Angular vs Mithril.js Analysis

@angular/core

v18.0.4(about 14 hours ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

@angular/core is a core package of the Angular framework, providing essential functionalities for building dynamic web applications. It includes features for components, dependency injection, directives, services, and more. Angular is known for its robust architecture, two-way data binding, and extensive tooling support through Angular CLI.

Alternatives:
@angular/material+
ngx-bootstrap+
primeng+
ng-zorro-antd+
@ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap+
@clr/angular+
@swimlane/ngx-datatable+
@ngx-translate/core+
@angular/flex-layout+
@ngrx/store+

Tags: javascriptframeworkangularwebcomponents

mithril

v2.2.2(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/mithrilNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Mithril is a modern client-side JavaScript framework for building single-page applications. It is known for its small size (only 8kb gzipped) and high performance, making it a great choice for lightweight applications where speed and efficiency are crucial. Mithril follows a minimalist design philosophy, providing a simple and elegant API for creating components, managing state, and handling routing.

Alternatives:
preact+
vue+
react+
svelte+
inferno+
alpinejs+
solid-js+
hyperapp+
lit+
riot+

Tags: javascriptframeworksingle-page-applicationlightweighthigh-performance

Fight!

Popularity

Angular is a widely adopted framework for building web applications, and '@angular/core' is a core package within the Angular ecosystem. It has a large community and is commonly used in enterprise-level applications. Mithril, on the other hand, is a lightweight and fast client-side framework but is less popular compared to Angular.

Performance

Mithril is known for its exceptional performance due to its small size and efficient virtual DOM implementation. It is lightweight and fast, making it a good choice for applications where performance is critical. Angular, while powerful, can be heavier and may not be as performant as Mithril in certain scenarios.

Scalability

Angular is designed for building large-scale applications with features like dependency injection, routing, and state management out of the box. It provides a more opinionated structure which can be beneficial for large teams and complex projects. Mithril, being lightweight and flexible, may require more manual setup for scalability but can be well-suited for smaller to medium-sized projects.

Developer Experience

Angular provides a comprehensive set of tools and features for developers, including a CLI for scaffolding projects, robust documentation, and a large community for support. Mithril, while having a smaller ecosystem, offers a simple and intuitive API that can lead to a more streamlined development experience for those who prefer minimalistic frameworks.

Learning Curve

Angular has a steeper learning curve due to its complexity and the number of concepts to grasp, especially for beginners. Mithril, being lightweight and having a simpler API, has a lower barrier to entry and can be easier to pick up for developers new to frontend frameworks.